Secure AI in Fintech 2025: The Compliance Conundrum

Investments in AI among highly regulated companies are skyrocketing. That’s great news for process automation and efficient workflows, but what does it mean for maintaining compliance?

Fintech companies are harnessing AI to manage numerous use cases for improved productivity and cost savings. However, one misstep out of regulatory compliance can cancel all these advancements through fines, penalties, or litigation costs, not to mention stock prices and reputation risks.

The Rise of AI in Financial Services

According to KPMG, the Fintech sector has embraced AI, with investments in AI technology exceeding $12 billion in 2023, reflecting its transformative impact¹_.

Let’s look at a publicly traded US Fintech company that provides digital payment processing for substantial transaction volumes. The company exemplifies increasing AI implementation in the financial sector: Its modern tech stack, built on cloud-native architectures and micro-services, uses multiple programming languages and incorporates extensive machine learning capabilities for fraud detection, risk management, and automated customer service.

However, every step of this company’s rapid AI adoption must contend with stringent existing regulations such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). These laws impose strict requirements on the handling, storing, and sharing of consumer data, ensuring transparency, fairness, and privacy. Financial institutions are also subject to regulations like the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), which mandates implementing robust data protection measures.

Additionally, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that companies protect material nonpublic information (MNPI) to prevent insider trading or other fraudulent practices.

Similarly, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces data security standards to ensure sensitive consumer information is not misused or compromised². For instance, financial institutions must safeguard customer information under GLBA and notify affected parties in case of breaches. At the same time, the SEC imposes disclosure obligations for any data mishandling that could materially impact investors. These existing frameworks underscore the critical importance of data privacy and security in AI integration, independent of emerging state-specific AI laws.

As 2025 progresses, it’s not yet clear how well AI integrations in Fintech companies are managing these compliance risks. While the tools these Fintech companies are building are performing, they’re also creating less apparent, mounting challenges in AI adoption that can’t be ignored:

Talent Shortages

The adoption of AI technologies presents multiple challenges for financial institutions. Finding qualified AI talent remains difficult, with median salaries for machine learning/AI engineers exceeding $160,000 annually. Despite successful recruitment, organizations struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving AI capabilities, leading to significant training costs and high turnover rates. Technical teams face the additional burden of managing legacy systems, complex hybrid infrastructure, and poor data governance while implementing new AI solutions, often resulting in compatibility issues and increased technical debt.

Keeping Pace with Emerging AI Threats

Ensuring compliance as AI threats evolve poses another significant hurdle. As AI systems become more sophisticated, ensuring they meet regulatory requirements becomes increasingly challenging while maintaining existing operations. Fintech organizations must navigate data privacy regulations, financial regulations, and AI-specific guidelines while maintaining robust security against emerging AI-related threats for technology that the developers themselves don’t fully understand.

Shadow AI and Policy Bypass

A concerning trend has emerged despite substantial investments in AI governance and training programs. Employees at regulated financial institutions are increasingly circumventing official channels to access AI tools. A recent survey by Software AG indicates that more than 50% of employees admit to using unauthorized AI tools for work-related tasks³. These “shadow AI” practices include:

Accessing public AI tools through unblocked websites
Disabling corporate VPNs to use restricted services
Using personal devices for work-related AI tasks while working remotely
Uploading sensitive company data to unauthorized third-party AI platforms

Corporate leadership often maintains a false sense of security, believing that existing policies, mandatory training modules, and traditional cybersecurity appliances adequately prevent the misuse and exploitation of AI. Meanwhile, discussions with low- and mid-level employees who manage the day-to-day operations frequently admit to uploading sensitive information about clients, consumers, or nonpublic corporate data to third-party AI tools because they believe no one will know they personally leaked the information. It saves them time and often increases the quality of their work, so it’s worth it in their mind.

Most of these employees are correct about the lack of attribution since current cybersecurity and monitoring capabilities fail to effectively identify most AI policy violations. From prior experience and observations of e-learning cybersecurity modules, most people click through the training as fast as possible so their manager doesn’t have to keep reminding them to complete the training. In turn, the employees do not grasp the lessons of the online training that is meant to help protect the company and its customers or consumers.

Severe Consequences of Non-Compliance

The ramifications of unauthorized AI use in regulated industries can be devastating. Financial institutions face fines from multiple regulatory bodies, with penalties potentially reaching millions of dollars per violation. For instance, the SEC imposes hefty fines for mishandling MNPI. At the same time, violations of the GLBA can result in penalties of up to $100,000 per violation for the institution, and individuals in charge can be fined up to $10,000 for each violation. Additionally, FTC enforcement actions for data breaches or non-compliance with privacy rules have led to settlements exceeding $275 million in recent years⁴.

Beyond immediate financial penalties, organizations may experience:

Loss of Business Contracts: Security breaches or compliance failures often result in the loss of critical business partnerships or customer contracts, reducing revenue streams.some text.
- For government contractors, if a contract is terminated, that can be the end of their government business.
Stock Price Decline: Public disclosure of incidents and financial penalties can lead to sharp declines in stock prices as investors lose confidence in the company.
Employee Terminations: Individuals involved in policy violations may face job loss and potential legal consequences, contributing to organizational disruption. some text
- Data breaches often result in the CEO being terminated or forced to step down⁵.
Increased Insurance Costs: Cybersecurity insurance premiums often spike after incidents, and insurers commonly reject insurance claims. some text
- In 2024, over 40% of cyber insurance claims were denied⁶. One of the top reasons is companies fail to meet security requirements.
Reputation Damage: The erosion of consumer trust and public confidence can take years to rebuild, affecting the long-term market position and growth potential.

These consequences highlight the need for robust compliance frameworks and AI security to mitigate the risks associated with regulatory violations.

Proactive Solutions for AI Risk

Organizations can protect themselves from these risks by implementing comprehensive AI risk mitigation solutions like Preamble. Such platforms offer:

Real-time monitoring of AI usage across the organization
Technical enforcement of AI policies
Detailed audit trails for regulatory compliance
Secure alternatives to public AI tools
US-centric data storage
Protection against evolving AI threats
Managed and regular updates for AI guardrails
Ensure compliance with corporate and industry policies

By taking a proactive approach to AI risk mitigation, organizations can harness the benefits of AI technology while maintaining security, compliance, and control over sensitive data. Investing in proper AI risk mitigation tools represents a fraction of the potential costs of non-compliance and data breaches.

The rapid advancement of AI capabilities demands equally sophisticated risk mitigation solutions. Organizations must implement comprehensive monitoring and enforcement mechanisms beyond simple policies and training modules. Only then can they confidently embrace AI innovation while protecting their interests and maintaining regulatory compliance.

‍

Secure AI in Fintech 2025: The Compliance Conundrum

Get our updates.

Worry less and do more with secure AI